山梨大学電子シラバス>検索結果一覧>授業データ



授業科目名 科学者倫理
時間割番号 GSC501 D
担当教員名 小島　立
開講学期・曜日・時限 集中・(未登録)・(未登録) 単位数 1
＜対象学生＞
This course targets natural science students who are expected to learn fundamental issues in "Research Ethics", and "Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy" in contemporary society.
＜授業の目的＞
In this course, we would like to discuss the role of natural scientists in contemporary society from a multidimensional perspective.
　It is evident that contemporary society has greatly benefited from the achievement of science and technology. In order to be responsive to societal support, the accomplishment of scientific research and the publication of research results should be made in a fair and accountable manner. This is the issue of "Research Ethics" or "Research Integrity".
　Various innovations derived from scientific research also provide a variety of benefits which improves our quality of life. It is now presumed that various "smart technologies" including AI, Big Data, Robotics, Internet of Things (IoT), etc. will dramatically change our lives and society very soon.
　However, technological innovation inevitably accompanies disruption, which creates uncertainties and risks. If we cannot properly control such uncertainties, new technologies and innovation will not be empathically received throughout the society. This is the issue of "Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy."
　In Europe, for example, the concept of "Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)" has been discussed. RRI "implies that societal actors (researchers, citizens, policy makers, business, third sector organisations, etc.) work together during the whole research and innovation process in order to better align both the process and its outcomes with the values, needs and expectations of society." (https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation) In the United States and Japan, similar concept such as "Responsible Innovation" has been also argued.
　Regulating of the implementation of "smart technologies" is currently becoming more and more difficult, because regulatory framework cannot catch up with rapid advancement such as the proliferation of various global "platforms" to develop their business relying on these "smart technologies".
　Standing on the verge of complex "smart societies", it is obvious that natural scientists are more expected than ever to collaborate various actors in the society including policymakers, lawyers, civil society, etc. to find out and give solutions to minimize uncertainties. This is the reason why we need to learn from the discussion of RRI.
＜本授業科目による獲得・涵養が特に期待されるコンピテンシー＞（能力・資質）
医工農学総合教育部向け
記号コンピテンシー（能力・資質）説明 
M-A共通教養倫理観及び社会性、国際性高度で専門的な知識と能力を有する職業人として求められる法律や研究倫理を深く理解している職業人として必要な法律、研究倫理の理解している◎
M-B汎用能力専門に根差した科学的思考力現代社会が直面する課題に関するデータについて、様々な研究分野におけるデータ解析手法に精通し活用できる課題解決に研究分野のデータ解析手法に精通し活用できる○
M-C論理的コミュニケーションスキル自己の研究の成果を社会に応用し、役立つよう、社会に積極的に還元するために専門分野を越えて他分野の人たちと論理的なコミュニケーションができる○
＜到達目標＞  到達目標とは
目標NO説明コンピテンシーとの対応
修士
＜成績評価の方法＞
目標No割合評価の観点
合計0% 
＜授業の方法＞
This course will consist of 8 classes and intensively meet for 3 days. Participants are expected to read assignments beforehand, and to be actively engaged in class participation. At the end of the course, all participants are expected to make 3 minutes'''''''''''''''' presentation.
＜受講に際して・学生へのメッセージ＞
In contemporary society, it is getting more and more important for natural scientists to communicate with various societal actors in order to conduct scientific research accountably and responsively, and to socially implement the fruits of science and technology in a harmonious manner. The instructor envisages a productive discussion related to "Research Ethics", and "Science, Technology, Innovation (STI) Policy" with participants of this course.
＜テキスト＞
  1. Science Council of Japan (SCJ), Statement: Code of Conduct for Scientists --Revised Version-- (2013),
    (available at http://www.scj.go.jp/en/report/Code_of_Conduct_for_Scientists.pdf)

  2. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research (3rd ed., National Academies Press, 2009),
    (available at https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12192/on being a scientist a guide to responsible conduct in)

  3. Kathi E. Hanna, The Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program of the National Center for Human Genome Research: A Missed Opportunity?, in Ruth Ellen Bulger, Elizabeth Meyer Bobby and Harvey V. Fineberg (eds.), Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine, (National Academies Press 1995), pp.432-457,
    (available at https://www.nap.edu/catalog/4771/societys-choices-social-and-ethical-decision-making-in-biomedicine)

  4. RRI Tools, A practical guide to Responsible Research and Innovation: Key Lessons from RRI Tools (2016),
    (available at https://www.rri-tools.eu/-/rri-tools-a-practical-guide-to-responsible-research-and-innovation-key-lessons-from-rri-tools-)
＜参考書＞
  1. Harvard Referencing: Home (Victoria University, Australia),
    (available at http://libraryguides.vu.edu.au/harvard/home)

  2. Lawrence Lessig, Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0 (2nd Revised ed, Basic Books 2006 ),
    (available at http://codev2.cc/download+remix/Lessig Codev2.pdf)

  3. OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2018: Adapting to Technological and Societal Disruption (320 pages including tables and figures),
    (available at https://www.oecd.org/sti/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook-25186167.htm)
＜授業計画の概要＞
＜前年度授業に対する改善要望等への対応＞
＜備考＞
(未登録)